The Art of Being Slightly Unavailable
In defence of boundaries, privacy, and not answering every text
I think we've made accessibility a requirement.
We admire the friend who always replies immediately. The colleague who answers emails at midnight. The person who never seems to miss a message.
Being available has somehow become synonymous with being kind, committed, and reliable.
But lately, I’ve started wondering if we’ve got it backwards.
Maybe we’re all just a little too easy to reach.
And maybe the people who are slightly unavailable are onto something.
Not impossible to reach. Just unavailable enough to have lives of their own.
They don’t answer every text immediately. They don’t feel compelled to explain every decision, share every opinion, or document every experience in real time.
Parts of their lives remain theirs.
At first, I thought this was confidence.
Now I think it’s something much simpler: boundaries.
They understand something the rest of us seem to forget:
Access is not the same thing as connection.
We’ve spent the last decade (or more…) building a culture around accessibility. Technology has made it possible for anyone to reach us at any time, and somewhere along the way we collectively decided this was progress.
A delayed response became rude. A missed call required an explanation.
And if you didn’t answer a text within six minutes, people started wondering whether you were ignoring them, dead, or both.
Being busy became something you apologized for, as though having a life outside your inbox was a character flaw.
We’ve become so accustomed to immediate access that we’ve started treating it as a measure of care. If someone responds quickly, they value us. If they don’t, they must not.
But that’s a strange standard when you think about it.
I wonder if we’ve experienced a kind of accessibility inflation.
The easier it became to reach one another, the more access people began to expect.
What was once considered exceptional became normal.
Then expected.
Then somehow, insufficient.
A same-day response became an instant response. An instant response became proof that you cared.
Twenty years ago, most of us would have considered it perfectly reasonable to wait a day or two for a reply. Maybe even a week…Today, if someone takes a few hours, we start constructing elaborate theories about why they hate us.
The technology changed. Our expectations changed with it.
Personally, I think some of the people who care about us most regularly take hour…sometimes days, to respond to a message. Obviously, context matters. If it’s serious, this theory does not apply. I think I’m being followed by someone terrifying, or I am very ill, or I have been robbed at gun point. Please answer me.
But most of the time, it’s not because they don’t value the relationship. They’re just busy living their lives.
As should you be. :)
They’re working, reading, spending time with their families, getting lost in projects, taking long walks, or doing something that has become surprisingly rare: existing without being immediately reachable.
Ironically, these are often the people who are most present when it actually matters.
The issue isn’t that we’ve become more connected. It’s that we’ve confused connection with access.
Knowing what someone had for breakfast isn’t intimacy. It’s just information.
If it were intimacy, I’d be emotionally attached to half the internet and their overpriced matcha orders.
Watching someone’s vacation unfold through Instagram stories isn’t intimacy.
Being able to reach someone at any hour of the day isn’t intimacy.
Real connection has never depended on constant availability. If anything, the opposite may be true.
For years, luxury meant access.
Access to more information.
More entertainment.
More opportunities.
More people.
But lately, I’ve started to think luxury looks different.
Luxury is uninterrupted time.
A conversation where nobody checks their phone.
A weekend without notifications.
An afternoon spent reading without feeling compelled to document it.
Privacy has quietly become one of the most valuable things we own. Not because we’re hiding anything, but because so much of modern life is designed to extract our attention.
There is something valuable about maintaining a small amount of distance between yourself and the rest of the world. Not because you’re trying to appear mysterious, but because boundaries create space for a life to exist.
Without boundaries, every thought becomes content. Every minor inconvenience becomes a story. Every vacation becomes a production schedule.
And suddenly you’re no longer having an experience…
You’re managing one.
Most of us understand this when it comes to money. We know we can’t spend recklessly and expect our bank account to thrive.
Yet when it comes to attention, we act like billionaires.
We hand it out to emails, notifications, group chats, social feeds, breaking news alerts, and that one person from high school who resurfaces every three years with a “business opportunity.”
Then we wonder why we’re exhausted.
Attention, it turns out, is a finite resource.
Somewhere along the way, responsiveness became a virtue.
We celebrate the colleague who answers emails at midnight. We admire the friend who replies immediately. We treat constant availability as evidence of professionalism, commitment, or kindness.
But sometimes it’s simply poor boundaries with good branding.
Boom. That gave you goosebumps. Didn’t it?! Boundaries…What a strong and beautiful word…
The ability to respond instantly says very little about whether someone is present, thoughtful, or reliable. It only tells us they’re available.
For a long time, I thought being a good person meant being available.
If a text came in, I answered it.
If someone needed help, I volunteered.
If an email landed in my inbox at 9:47 p.m., I’d respond by 9:52 p.m. because apparently I was running a 24-hour customer support line for everyone in my life.
I genuinely believed accessibility was generosity.
Now I’m not so sure.
Lately, I’ve been thinking about attention differently.
Not as something I spend, but as something I give.
Every notification, every email, every request takes a small piece of it.
And while that may not have felt significant when I was younger, it feels different now.
Maybe that’s part of getting older. Maybe it’s becoming more aware of what matters. Either way, I’ve become increasingly protective of where my attention goes because I’ve realized it’s ultimately where my life goes too.
I think being a good friend, colleague, partner, or family member has less to do with constant availability and more to do with intentional presence.
I’d rather have someone who takes two days to answer my text but gives me their full attention when we’re together than someone who responds instantly while half-paying attention to everything.
You know the type. They reply in seven seconds, then when you see them in person, they’ve completely forgotten they even answered. Or that you had the conversation in the first place.
True story.
The people I’m talking about aren’t unavailable because they’re playing hard to get.
Although, I’d be lying if I said I’ve never looked at a text while already holding my phone and thought, “You can wait 54 minutes.”
Not out of spite. Not because I’m trying to seem important.
But because I’ve learned that the speed at which you reply quietly becomes the speed people expect.
If you’re always available in thirty seconds, thirty seconds becomes the standard.
Sometimes waiting a little isn’t about making someone else wait. It’s about reminding yourself that every notification doesn’t deserve immediate access to your attention.
They’re unavailable because they’re fully engaged in something else.
Their moment to relax, and honestly…not think about others.
Their work.
Their relationships.
Their hobbies.
Their thoughts.
Their actual lives.
They've stopped feeling like they owe everyone immediate access to them.
They’ve realized that just because someone can reach them doesn’t mean they’re entitled to their attention.
And perhaps that’s what makes them so appealing in the first place.
Not mystery.
Not status.
Just the quiet confidence of someone who understands that access is something to be given thoughtfully, not automatically.
In a world that increasingly demands our attention at every moment, being slightly unavailable may be one of the healthiest choices we can make.
Not unavailable enough that people file a missing persons report.
Just unavailable enough to remember you have a life of your own.








“Access is not the same thing as connection” says it perfectly. Being constantly reachable can look like care from the outside while quietly draining the attention needed for real presence.
Brilliant breakdown of our insane way of living. Oh for boundaries and taking a breathe before replying with two thumbs at the speed of light. Oh to dial a telephone like in the old days and fumble with the curly cord around my fingers! Oh to realise I can sit with that message while I eat my sandwich without single thumbing out a one word response that means diddly squat. I’ m returning to the SLOW method. I might even sell all my machines and just handmake and handwrite everything here on in. Not joking..